Jensen Huang | Does AI Revenue Justify Capex, '27 AI Bottlenecks, Singularity, Open vs Closed & more

About this episode

Can AI revenues justify the spending? Jensen Huang breaks down the biggest bottlenecks heading into 2027, the path to the singularity, open vs. closed models, and why he’s 99.99% optimistic about the decade ahead. Jensen joins Brad Gerstner and Clark Tang for their third BG2 conversation, recorded days after the Xi State Dinner, the White House Accord on superintelligence, and his receipt of the National Medal of Science. They explore why building technology responsibly also means moving fast, how power constraints could shape AI’s next phase, and whether SpaceX could help put data centers in orbit. Jensen also explains why NVIDIA sees demand extending far beyond just two AI labs. Produced by STMNT Studios Music by Yung Spielberg www.bg2pod.com Follow: Brad Gerstner https://x.com/altcap Clark Tang https://x.com/_clarktang NVIDIA https://x.com/nvidia BG2 Pod https://x.com/BG2Pod The statements made and information presented in this podcast reflect each speaker's personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the view of any other person or entity, including Altimeter Capital Management, LP ("Altimeter"). The information provided is believed to be from reliable sources, but no liability is accepted for any inaccuracies. This podcast is for informational purposes only, and statements should not be construed as providing investment advice or making an investment recommendation. Past performance does not guarantee future performance. Certain of Altimeter's funds have invested in the referenced portfolio companies, which may incentivize executives of such companies to provide favorable reviews of Altimeter. Altimeter and its respective clients trade in public securities and have made and/or may make investments in or investment decisions relating to the companies referenced in the podcast. Altimeter and its respective clients reserve the right to make investment decisions or engage in trading activity that would be (or could be construed as) consistent and/or inconsistent with the views expressed herein.